Dynamic git URL for Jenkins builds
We internally use GitHub Enterprise and Jenkins. If I push on the main repository it is automatically build without and the Commit is marked as correct (just as Travis does this).
Dynamic git URL for Jenkins builds
We internally use GitHub Enterprise and Jenkins. If I push on the main repository it is automatically build without and the Commit is marked as correct (just as Travis does this).
Dynamic git URL for Jenkins builds
We internally use GitHub Enterprise and Jenkins. If I push on the main repository it is automatically build without and the Commit is marked as correct (just as Travis does this).
Dynamic git URL for Jenkins builds
We internally use GitHub Enterprise and Jenkins. If I push on the main repository it is automatically build without and the Commit is marked as correct (just as Travis does this).
Dynamic git URL for Jenkins builds
We internally use GitHub Enterprise and Jenkins. If I push on the main repository it is automatically build without and the Commit is marked as correct (just as Travis does this).
Why aren’t there cherry-pick requests?
One disadvantage to pull requests (aka merge requests) is lots and lots of merge commits.
Why aren’t there cherry-pick requests?
One disadvantage to pull requests (aka merge requests) is lots and lots of merge commits.
Why aren’t there cherry-pick requests?
One disadvantage to pull requests (aka merge requests) is lots and lots of merge commits.
Why aren’t there cherry-pick requests?
One disadvantage to pull requests (aka merge requests) is lots and lots of merge commits.
What is proper order of pull requests and testing?
We want to setup proper development workflow.
We have two main branches: master(release branch) and develop(working branch).
We want to use pull requests properly.
We see two ways how to do this: