Relative Content

Tag Archive for operator-precedence

Evaluation order of the expressions

The C Programming Language by K & R states that C, like most languages, does not specify the order in which operands of an operator are evaluated. (The exceptions are &&,||,?: and ‘,’). According to the book, the result of the statement :

Evaluation order of the expressions

The C Programming Language by K & R states that C, like most languages, does not specify the order in which operands of an operator are evaluated. (The exceptions are &&,||,?: and ‘,’). According to the book, the result of the statement :

Should ** bind more tightly than !, ~?

Designing a programming language, I’m including the ** exponentiation operator. In Fortran and Python, the two languages I know of which have this operator, it binds more tightly than unary minus, which makes sense for practicality as well as tradition.

Should ** bind more tightly than !, ~?

Designing a programming language, I’m including the ** exponentiation operator. In Fortran and Python, the two languages I know of which have this operator, it binds more tightly than unary minus, which makes sense for practicality as well as tradition.

Should ** bind more tightly than !, ~?

Designing a programming language, I’m including the ** exponentiation operator. In Fortran and Python, the two languages I know of which have this operator, it binds more tightly than unary minus, which makes sense for practicality as well as tradition.

Order of Operations Annoyance [duplicate]

This question already has answers here: Why do bitwise operators have lower priority than comparisons? (2 answers) Closed 9 years ago. In most programming languages (C#, JavaScript, Java) the order of operations precedence has that equality comparison come BEFORE bitwise comparisons. This means that if you have a bit operation and an equality comparison on […]