Understanding comparison using Big O notation
I was going through this heavily discussed and highly voted question on SO and stumbled across one comment that got 5 upvotes.
Does the Head(start) pointer of Doubly Linked list points previously to the tail(last) node
I have one question in my mind that in case of circular doubly linked list the head pointer of the doubly linked list also logically point to the next pointer of the tail node of the linked list and tail’s next pointer also point to the previous pointer of head.
How does a priority_queue maintain a heap on a deque efficiently?
In the C++ STL, priority_queue (heap) can be used with any underlying container, such as a deque. How does the implementation stay O(log n) if deques don’t swap an item in index a with index b in constant time?
Building a sequential list in languages with cons/linked lists
In languages where cons lists are a major datatype, it is very easy to create a list from last to first by prepending items. When doing processing from some input file, however, one is most likely to encounter items in first to last order.
Building a sequential list in languages with cons/linked lists
In languages where cons lists are a major datatype, it is very easy to create a list from last to first by prepending items. When doing processing from some input file, however, one is most likely to encounter items in first to last order.
Building a sequential list in languages with cons/linked lists
In languages where cons lists are a major datatype, it is very easy to create a list from last to first by prepending items. When doing processing from some input file, however, one is most likely to encounter items in first to last order.
Better design for a generic doubly linked list around which I plan to make different wrappers?
I am currently writing a C code for a doubly linked list(dll) around which I want to write wrapers for implementing stack, queues etc. instead of writing separate codes for all of them.
Better design for a generic doubly linked list around which I plan to make different wrappers?
I am currently writing a C code for a doubly linked list(dll) around which I want to write wrapers for implementing stack, queues etc. instead of writing separate codes for all of them.
Better design for a generic doubly linked list around which I plan to make different wrappers?
I am currently writing a C code for a doubly linked list(dll) around which I want to write wrapers for implementing stack, queues etc. instead of writing separate codes for all of them.
Better design for a generic doubly linked list around which I plan to make different wrappers?
I am currently writing a C code for a doubly linked list(dll) around which I want to write wrapers for implementing stack, queues etc. instead of writing separate codes for all of them.