Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is it a good idea to contextually name predefined functional interfaces?
I am currently working with Java 8 and using functional interfaces a lot. I often find myself writing code like this:
Is there a performance benefit to using the method reference syntax instead of lambda syntax in Java 8?
Do method references skip the overhead of the lambda wrapper? Might they in the future?
Is there a performance benefit to using the method reference syntax instead of lambda syntax in Java 8?
Do method references skip the overhead of the lambda wrapper? Might they in the future?
Is there a performance benefit to using the method reference syntax instead of lambda syntax in Java 8?
Do method references skip the overhead of the lambda wrapper? Might they in the future?