Design for an interface implementation that provides additional functionality
There is a design problem that I came upon while implementing an interface:
Design for an interface implementation that provides additional functionality
There is a design problem that I came upon while implementing an interface:
Design for an interface implementation that provides additional functionality
There is a design problem that I came upon while implementing an interface:
Design for an interface implementation that provides additional functionality
There is a design problem that I came upon while implementing an interface:
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.
Is it permissible to use explicit interface implementation to hide members in C#?
I understand how to work with interfaces and explicit interface implementation in C#, but I was wondering if it’s considered bad form to hide away certain members that would not be used frequently. For example: