Why do we need to include the .h while everything works when including only the .cpp file?
Why do we need to include both the .h
and .cpp
files while we can make it work solely by including the .cpp
file?
Why do we need to include the .h while everything works when including only the .cpp file?
Why do we need to include both the .h
and .cpp
files while we can make it work solely by including the .cpp
file?
Why do we need to include the .h while everything works when including only the .cpp file?
Why do we need to include both the .h
and .cpp
files while we can make it work solely by including the .cpp
file?
Is it good practice to rely on headers being included transitively?
I’m cleaning up the includes in a C++ project I’m working on, and I keep wondering whether or not I should explicitly include all headers used directly in a particular file, or whether I should only include the bare minimum.
Is it good practice to rely on headers being included transitively?
I’m cleaning up the includes in a C++ project I’m working on, and I keep wondering whether or not I should explicitly include all headers used directly in a particular file, or whether I should only include the bare minimum.
Using macros to protect assignment to global variables
Because there is no language feature in C to protect assignment to global variables would you recommend doing something like this?
cpp and h/hpp #include: “why” question
Why does the source include a header and not also the other way around? I googled it but only found questions regarding the use of header files, how to include them but nowhere to say why it is like it is.
If the header is merely the declaration, how does the compiler know the definition only from it?
For example: take foo.cpp
, bar.h
, bar.cpp
. This is what everybody does:
in foo.cpp
:
#include "bar.h"
but the bar.cpp
is not included neither in the bar.h
or foo.cpp
. That’s why I deem logical that bar.cpp
be included in bar.h
and so, indirectly in foo.cpp
.
cpp and h/hpp #include: “why” question
Why does the source include a header and not also the other way around? I googled it but only found questions regarding the use of header files, how to include them but nowhere to say why it is like it is.
If the header is merely the declaration, how does the compiler know the definition only from it?
For example: take foo.cpp
, bar.h
, bar.cpp
. This is what everybody does:
in foo.cpp
:
#include "bar.h"
but the bar.cpp
is not included neither in the bar.h
or foo.cpp
. That’s why I deem logical that bar.cpp
be included in bar.h
and so, indirectly in foo.cpp
.
In C++, should I ever declare a local variable in the corresponding header?
So for example, I create a class with two functions:
In C++, should I ever declare a local variable in the corresponding header?
So for example, I create a class with two functions: