Why isn’t `length` generic by default?
Haskell often provides two versions of a given function f, i.e:
Why isn’t `length` generic by default?
Haskell often provides two versions of a given function f, i.e:
Maths needed to understand theory behind Haskell’s type system?
Recently, I’ve become deeply interested in Haskell.
Maths needed to understand theory behind Haskell’s type system?
Recently, I’ve become deeply interested in Haskell.
Why C# is not statically typed but F# and Haskell are?
There was a talk given by Brian Hurt about advantages and disadvantages of static typing. Brian said that by static typing he don’t mean C#, but F# and Haskell.
Why C# is not statically typed but F# and Haskell are?
There was a talk given by Brian Hurt about advantages and disadvantages of static typing. Brian said that by static typing he don’t mean C#, but F# and Haskell.
Why isn’t there a typeclass for functions?
In a learning problem I’ve been messing around with, I realised I needed a typeclass for functions with operations for applying, composing etc. Reasons…
Is it possible to create custom Haskell “toplevels”?
I am writing a compiler in Haskell, trying to shun the lexing and parsing phases. I would like the source code to be an AST implemented as an algebraic type.
Types conversion from one package to other
I’m starting with Haskell in a RSA crypto project.
Digging in hackage I found two different packages to achieve my objective. The problem is that each package has its own version of the same type. (Same name and same fields)
GenProg for Haskell
I am linking to a similar question in which the person seemed to get it working. However, with the instructions I have followed nothing seems to work to get Haskell running.