Relative Content

Tag Archive for haskell

Types in Lisp and Scheme

I see now that Racket has types. At first glance it seems to be almost identical to Haskell typing. But is Lisp’s CLOS covering some of the space Haskell types cover? Creating a very strict Haskell type and an object in any OO language seems vaguely similar. It’s just that I’ve drunk some of the Haskell kool-aid and I’m totally paranoid that if I go down the Lisp road, I’ll be screwed due to dynamic typing.

Could we build a functional computer?

As mush as FP has done, in the end, all our programs are structured.
That is, it doesn’t matter how pure or functional we make a them – they are always translated to assembly,
so what actually runs behind the hoods are instructions, states and loops.
We are kind of emulating FP.

Modern REPL for Haskell – is anybody working on it? [closed]

It’s difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, visit the help center. Closed 11 years ago. It’s time Haskell had a modern REPL like […]