Should changes to FNV-1A’s input exhibit the avalanche effect?
This is kind of related to Which hashing algorithm is best for uniqueness and speed?. In that question, the excellently written top answer notes,
Should changes to FNV-1A’s input exhibit the avalanche effect?
This is kind of related to Which hashing algorithm is best for uniqueness and speed?. In that question, the excellently written top answer notes,
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
Can someone please explain reverse look up tables? [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
What are the advantages of linear probing over separate chaining or vice-versa when implementing hash tables?
I’ve been brushing up on algorithms and reviewed these two methods of implementing hash tables. It seems like they largely have similar performance characteristics and memory requirements.
Is it possible to speed up a hash table by using binary search trees for separate chaining?
I want to implement a Hash Table using Binary Search Trees to reduce the search complexity in the Separate Chaining process from O(n) (using linked list) to O(log n) (using BST). Can this be done, and if yes then how? It would be easier to understand if solution is step by step, implementation of the logic.