I would like the API user to receive responses from the fields they have access to, and an error response for the rest. In the case of a directive, the entire query will return an error, even if the user has access to some fields. I know it is possible to implement the @include logic on the client side to skip certain fields in specific cases, but I would like to avoid this as it requires a lot of work (having to pass information to the client about what they have access to).

fragment rowHeader on GridRowEdge { …rowHeaderExpandIcon …addItemRow_gridRowEdge node { …rowHeader_Row id } } and fragment rowHeader_Row on GridRow { id path hasChildren pmEntity { id name model { id slug displayName { singular } } permissions { hasEdit } …pmEntityIcon …requirePmEntityUserPermissions } …pmEntityAccessIndicator_rowHeader } Is it possible to reconstruct the typedef of this query? My […]

I have write below query in GraphQL but it returing error

If I have the following rest endpoints:

I want to be able to apply custom directives to the my mutation input variables. I’ve tried a variety of solutions, including the example given by graphql-tools, however, I haven’t been able to find anything that does the following:

I’m new to GraphQL and I want to use it from the following documentation section: Query synthax

Does it have any affect? My understanding is that ID is primarily used for caching, which implies it should only be used for type objects and not input.

Schema:

When using ID as a type identifier, the same code returns different types in different environments, one environment is String, and the other environment is Int. Should the return value type use a strong type instead of an ID type? Different types will lead to different results for === or some components.

Hi All I’m new to Graphql Query , I have a requirement that need to get the count from table based on filter
For eg I have a user table need to know count no of male and no female and others using a single query any one please help me out on it