I have a repository with a version (semantic versioning) hardcoded in one of its files. Each time a developer adds a change (let’s call it a type 1 change), I need to review those changes and increment the minor version component. If a developer adds a type 2 change, I increment the patch version component.

I have a repository with a version (semantic versioning) hardcoded in one of its files. Each time a developer adds a change (let’s call it a type 1 change), I need to review those changes and increment the minor version component. If a developer adds a type 2 change, I increment the patch version component.

I have a repository with a version (semantic versioning) hardcoded in one of its files. Each time a developer adds a change (let’s call it a type 1 change), I need to review those changes and increment the minor version component. If a developer adds a type 2 change, I increment the patch version component.

====== STR Start ======

Is it possible to furnish a single commit with something akin to a pull-completion-handler?

I’m curious why Git doesn’t have a post-push hook. Is it due to technical reasons, or has it just not been implemented yet, or are there other considerations?

I’m experimenting with git-hooks and custom repo layout, where I need to prepare (update in a special way) sources before pulling changes from the remote.
I couldn’t find the proper git-hook in the official list, and few related questions (like Is there any git hook for pull?) aren’t applicable in my case, since they usually focus on the post-pull phase (i.e. can be handled with post-merge or a simlar hook), while post-fetch is the last phase when I can do my tricks with the sources 🙂

I created a .git/hooks/commmit-msg hook that is triggered correctly on git commit but on top of that, as other git actions such as

I created a post-receive hook like that