GitHub etiquette for duplicating a repo to change functionality
I’ve found a GitHub project I’d like to add some features to. After contacting the maintainer, the changes aren’t in line with the direction he’s going but he’s interested to see what I do with it. What is the GitHub etiquette for using one repo as a base for another project that almost certainly won’t ever be merged back into the original?
Should I fork a fork (on Github)? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
Should I fork a fork (on Github)? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
Should I fork a fork (on Github)? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
Should I fork a fork (on Github)? [closed]
Closed 10 years ago.
Is it correct to ask contributers to rebase their pull requests on github
I maintain a relatively popular github repo.
Zero Day Exploit Ethics/Etiquette [duplicate]
This question already has answers here: You’re hired to fix a small bug for a security-intensive site. Looking at the code, it’s filled with security holes. What do you do? [closed] (7 answers) Closed 10 years ago. What are my responsibilities, as a developer, if I stumble upon a zero day exploit in a widely […]
Fork a subset of a repo – licensing and etiquette
I’m a contributor to a large open source project. I have made heavy changes to a submodule of that project to support more functionality, but at this point further improvements will be outside the scope of the original project. As such, I have pulled only the relevant files to the submodule into their own repo, and am proceeding with a major rewrite to allow for these new features. The file structure is such that this submodule can live on it’s own, with the original as a dependency.
Fork a subset of a repo – licensing and etiquette
I’m a contributor to a large open source project. I have made heavy changes to a submodule of that project to support more functionality, but at this point further improvements will be outside the scope of the original project. As such, I have pulled only the relevant files to the submodule into their own repo, and am proceeding with a major rewrite to allow for these new features. The file structure is such that this submodule can live on it’s own, with the original as a dependency.
Why squash git commits for pull requests?
Why does every serious Github repo I do pull requests for want me to squash my commits into a single commit?