Entity Framework Code First Centralized database deployment
I originally posted this on stack overflow but was told that here is a better place to ask this kinda stuff. I couldn’t find any other similar answered question but if there is one please give me a link.
Controller / Service – Should a service save changes to the database
I have an action on my controller called DeleteLine
. This removes a line from the users basket.
Controller / Service – Should a service save changes to the database
I have an action on my controller called DeleteLine
. This removes a line from the users basket.
Controller / Service – Should a service save changes to the database
I have an action on my controller called DeleteLine
. This removes a line from the users basket.
Using Code First concept of Entity Framework in production
I’m developing an application and I have a database with it using Entity Framework Code First
concept. I like this approach very much. I’m using the latest version of EF which is 6.1.1.
Using Code First concept of Entity Framework in production
I’m developing an application and I have a database with it using Entity Framework Code First
concept. I like this approach very much. I’m using the latest version of EF which is 6.1.1.
Using Code First concept of Entity Framework in production
I’m developing an application and I have a database with it using Entity Framework Code First
concept. I like this approach very much. I’m using the latest version of EF which is 6.1.1.
Inverse property naming (ORM scenario) [closed]
Closed 9 years ago.
How to represent an optional-to-optional relationship in a database
I have two types of users: a CRM user and a system user. We have a record of every CRM user, thanks to a nightly sync that we run (so we don’t have to hit the CRM API every time). We have system users that don’t have CRM accounts. We also have CRM users that aren’t in our system. If a system user happens to have a CRM account, we want to link the two accounts together. So, this is an optional-to-optional relationship.
How to represent an optional-to-optional relationship in a database
I have two types of users: a CRM user and a system user. We have a record of every CRM user, thanks to a nightly sync that we run (so we don’t have to hit the CRM API every time). We have system users that don’t have CRM accounts. We also have CRM users that aren’t in our system. If a system user happens to have a CRM account, we want to link the two accounts together. So, this is an optional-to-optional relationship.