Why does clang think I have a copy constructor?
I have a struct with these special member functions:
Implicit calls to “new” and “delete”?
While learning C++, I came across a statement that the constructor and destructor make implicit calls to new and delete operators during memory allocation. I am not able to understand it properly as while delving deep into this statement I found out that new and delete operators make implicit calls to constructors and destructors.
Now it’s really confusing…
Is there equivalent of initializer list in C#?
In C++, you can define constructor like this:
Does constructor implicitly return value in C++?
I searched online and was told that constructor in C++ doesn’t have a return value, but we do have such code: