Does ospanstream have any safety checks with respect to the output buffer size? or is it just expected to be a memory bug?

I wrote this simple test to overload based on whether this is an rvalue or an lvalue. The original version had additional cases, but I reduced it down to the one that’s puzzling me.

I wrote this simple test to overload based on whether this is an rvalue or an lvalue. The original version had additional cases, but I reduced it down to the one that’s puzzling me.

I wrote this simple test to overload based on whether this is an rvalue or an lvalue. The original version had additional cases, but I reduced it down to the one that’s puzzling me.

I wrote this simple test to overload based on whether this is an rvalue or an lvalue. The original version had addition cases, but I reduced it down the one that’s puzzling me.

Consider the following code (https://godbolt.org/z/Tjf4csba4):

Consider the following code (https://godbolt.org/z/Tjf4csba4):

I realize that the order of parameter evaluation of a function call is not guaranteed to be one way or the other. But, is there a good reason that GCC has a different ordering when in a constexpr context? The example below can be set to fail either at run-time or compile-time.

Using latest MSVC:

Similar to The new syntax “= default” in C++11