Is there a meaningful difference in this ‘@()’ construction or is this a bug?
I have a function whose name
parameter I want to provide tab completion for, the tab completion values are file names found in c:temp
. On top of using the files in c:temp
as values, I also want to add additional tab completion values.
Below is the function
Is there a meaningful difference in this ‘@()’ construction or is this a bug?
I have a function whose name
parameter I want to provide tab completion for, the tab completion values are file names found in c:temp
. On top of using the files in c:temp
as values, I also want to add additional tab completion values.
Below is the function
Is there a meaningful difference in this ‘@()’ construction or is this a bug?
I have a function whose name
parameter I want to provide tab completion for, the tab completion values are file names found in c:temp
. On top of using the files in c:temp
as values, I also want to add additional tab completion values.
Below is the function