Cross browser client side storage
I am developing an angularjs app. The app has to run in current FF, IE, Chrome and on iOS/Android via Phonegap.
In AngularJS, why do we use scope instead of $scope in the directive link?
Just curious why whenever I see an example of a directive using a link, the parameter for scope is scope and not $scope?
In AngularJS, why do we use scope instead of $scope in the directive link?
Just curious why whenever I see an example of a directive using a link, the parameter for scope is scope and not $scope?
In AngularJS, why do we use scope instead of $scope in the directive link?
Just curious why whenever I see an example of a directive using a link, the parameter for scope is scope and not $scope?
In AngularJS, why do we use scope instead of $scope in the directive link?
Just curious why whenever I see an example of a directive using a link, the parameter for scope is scope and not $scope?
SPA Applications: AJAX to fetch templates or build from strings
I’m working on a large angular application and I’m currently using a factory class that builds HTML templates from strings. We don’t have to worry about mobile support for the application and I’m wondering from an architectural standpoint, which method would you rather implement and why: static HTML files that are fetched on request, or a class that builds the templates as strings?
SPA Applications: AJAX to fetch templates or build from strings
I’m working on a large angular application and I’m currently using a factory class that builds HTML templates from strings. We don’t have to worry about mobile support for the application and I’m wondering from an architectural standpoint, which method would you rather implement and why: static HTML files that are fetched on request, or a class that builds the templates as strings?
SPA Applications: AJAX to fetch templates or build from strings
I’m working on a large angular application and I’m currently using a factory class that builds HTML templates from strings. We don’t have to worry about mobile support for the application and I’m wondering from an architectural standpoint, which method would you rather implement and why: static HTML files that are fetched on request, or a class that builds the templates as strings?
SPA Applications: AJAX to fetch templates or build from strings
I’m working on a large angular application and I’m currently using a factory class that builds HTML templates from strings. We don’t have to worry about mobile support for the application and I’m wondering from an architectural standpoint, which method would you rather implement and why: static HTML files that are fetched on request, or a class that builds the templates as strings?
Is one of these the more “Angular” way of communicating with a directive?
I am working on a project where I would like to encapsulate a directive library and distribute it to other developers to use. I would like to keep the changes to the model within this encapsulated code, so I don’t really want the dev’s changing the scope variables outside of the lib.