From brain driven development

It turns out, that every Function you’ll ever define in Scala, will
become an instance of an Implementation which will feature a certain
Function Trait.

There is a whole bunch of that Function Traits, ranging from Function1 up to
Function22.

Since Functions are Objects in Scala and Scala is a statically typed
language, it has to provide an appropriate type for every Function
which comes with a different number of arguments. If you define a
Function with two arguments, the compiler picks Function2 as the
underlying type.

Also, from Michael Froh’s blog

You need to make FunctionN classes for each number of parameters that
you want? Yes, but you define the classes once and then you use them
forever, or ideally they’re already defined in a library (e.g.
Functional Java defines classes F, F2, …, F8, and the Scala standard
library defines classes Function1, …, Function22)

So we have a list of function traits (Scala), and a list of interfaces (Functional-java) to enable us to have first class funtions.

I am trying to understand exactly why this is the case. I know, in Java for example, when I write a method say,

public int add(int a, int b){
    return a + b;
}

That I cannot go ahead and write

add(3,4,5);

( error would be something like : method add cannot be applied to give types )

We simply have to define an interface/trait for functions with different parameters, because of static typing?