Let’s say I have this:

class MyPackage ( dict ) :
  def __init__ ( self ) :
    super().__init__()

  def __setitem__ ( self, key, value ) :
    raise NotImplementedError( "use set()" )

  def __getitem__ ( self, key ) :
    raise NotImplementedError( "use get()" )

  def set ( self, key, value ) :
    # some magic
    self[key] = value

  def get ( self, key ) :
    # some magic
    if not key in self.keys() : return "no!"
    return self[key]

(Here, # some magic is additional code that justifies MyPackage as opposed to ‘just a dictionary.’)

The whole point is, I want to provided a dictionary-like object that forces the use of get() and set() methods and disallows all access via [], i.e. it is not permitted to use a['x']="wow" or print( a['x'] ) However, the minute I call get() or set(), the NotImplementedError is raised. Contrast this with, say, Lua, where you can bypass “overloading” by using “raw” getters and setters. Is there any way I can do this in Python without making MyPackage contain a dictionary (as opposed to being a dictionary)?