I have encountered the following pattern while programming in Haskell (but the pattern could occur in any language supporting lists, option types, and mapping of a function over a list). I have types a and b and a function
f :: a -> Maybe b
Now I want to define a function that maps f on a list of type [a], but I am not interested to have a result of type [Maybe b]. Rather, I want to have Just [y1, ..., yn], if [f(x1), ..., f(xn)] == [Just y1, ..., Just yn], and Nothing otherwise (i.e. if f(xi) == Nothing for at least one i). So the result must be of type Maybe [b].
I solved this by using the following helper function:
combine :: Maybe b -> Maybe [b] -> Maybe [b]
combine me ml = do
l <- ml
e <- me
Just (e : l)
and then
g :: (a -> Maybe b) -> [a] -> Maybe [b]
g f xs = foldr combine (Just []) (map f xs)
So, for example, if I have
f x = if x > 0 then Just x else Nothing
xs0 = [1, 2, 3, 4]
xs1 = [-1, -2, 3, 4]
xs2 = [-1, -2, -3, -4]
then
map f xs0 = [Just 1, Just 2, Just 3, Just 4]
g f xs0 = Just [1, 2, 3, 4]
map f xs1 = [Nothing, Nothing, Just 3, Just 4]
g f xs1 = Nothing
map f xs2 = [Nothing, Nothing, Nothing, Nothing]
g f xs2 = Nothing
The solution with combine and foldr works, but I wanted to ask if you know of a more compact solution for turning a [Maybe a] into a Maybe [a] as described above.
2
You want a function with this signature:
(a -> Maybe b) -> [a] -> Maybe [b]
Entering this into hoogle gives this possibility:
Prelude mapM :: Monad m => (a -> m b) -> [a] -> m [b]
A look at the Hackage documentation for mapM says it is the same as:
mapM f = sequence . map f
and that the definition of sequence is:
sequence :: Monad m => [m a] -> m [a]
sequence ms = foldr k (return []) ms
where
k m m' = do { x <- m; xs <- m'; return (x:xs) }
which is pretty much your foldr solution.
The best way to approach this is to go to FP Complete’s Hoogle and type in the signature you’re looking for, (a -> Maybe b) -> [a] -> Maybe [b]. The first hit is a function called mapM which is exactly what you are looking for. In fact it works for all Monads, not just Maybe. (If you want to be even more general you can use traverse)
2