I am gradually porting and refactoring C code to C++.

In the original C code, I have constructs like this:

Object* obj = &objects[index]

where objects is a global Object[].

I refactored the code so the array is dynamically allocated and a different object holds the array:

struct Info {
    Object* objects;
}

Due to my gradual refactoring, I wrote the following free function:

Object* GetObjects(Info* i) {
    return i->objects;
}

Now my question is:

Does the following code behave like I would expect (getting the address of an object in the array)?:

Object* obj = &GetObjects(info)[index];

Am I getting the Address of an object in the array (what I want) here or the address of the array or some rvalue and invoke UB?
[] has higher precedence than & but does that also count for function calls?