I am trying to implement boolean data type in C. Basically, I am working with sets.
The following code can be used to access each bit but I am unsure whether I can represent sets using this method.
Can somebody clarify this for me?
struct SET {
unsigned int b0 :1; // bit 0 single bit
unsigned int b1 :1; // bit 1 single bit
unsigned int b2 :1;
unsigned int b3 :1;
};
I can define two structures s1 and s2.. and I will be able to access each bit of these structures (treated as boolean strings).
I will have to perform set operations like UNION, INTERSECTION and MEMBERSHIP. Is this even possible in C?
Note: I cannot use Java, only C.
7
C doesn’t have any built-in set operations, but if your sets can be represented by a bitset with fewer than 64 bits (32 in older implementations), then you can use bit-operations to simulate the set operations (using AND (&) for set intersection and OR (|) for set union).
Your structure is easy for testing membership (just see if the corresponding member is not 0), but not that easy for operations on multiple bits. That is easier on an unsigned number. To get the best of both worlds, use a union:
union SET {
struct items {
unsigned int a: 1;
unsigned int b: 1;
unsigned int c: 1;
unsigned int d: 1;
unsigned int e: 1;
unsigned int f: 1;
unsigned int g: 1;
unsigned int h: 1;
};
uint8_t bits; // As we only have 8 items for our set
};
You do the bit operations on the bits member, and the membership tests/sets on the items.[abcdefgh] members.
3
In memory these can be accessed as flags, so you can use standard flag operations,
struct SET {
unsigned int b0 :1; // bit 0 single bit
unsigned int b1 :1; // bit 1 single bit
unsigned int b2 :1;
unsigned int b3 :1;
};
struct SETFlag {
union {
SET set;
unsigned int set_as_flag;
};
};
/* example use */
SETFlag a, b, c;
/* initialize */
c.set_as_flag = a.set_as_flag | b.set_as_flag; /* union */
/* c.set, now you can use set */
This assumes you have <= 32 members for a 4 byte int, you could ensure its value is correct,
_Static_assert(sizeof(((struct SETFlag *)0)->set) <=
sizeof(((struct SETFlag *)0)->set_as_flag),
"SETFlag.set_as_flag is too small!");
However all this begs the question, why not just use flags.
1